Send this article to Promobot

Time to accept governor's compromise

June 15th 7:42 pm | Jim Jansen, Marc Langland, and Tony Knowles Print this article   Email this article  

We must end th?standof?in Juneau because the option of doing nothin?is devastating to Alaska, an?deliver?a crippling blow to our fragile economy?Another year of stalemate would deplete our reserves and would fail to reverse our slide into recession.

After calling the Legislature into special session, the governor proposed a compromis?to break the Legislative deadlock. The compromise is a masterful blend of all of the ideas and positions currently on the table from the governor, the Senate, and the House. It is less tha?perfect and has plenty to make everyone "equally unhappy." That said?it is a bold and significant step in creating a long-term sustainable budget that, while at a substantially reduced size, provides essential services, invests in education, and encourages business investments and jobs.

A complete plan would have included a budget that does not reduce any savings account. This compromise likely falls short of that by about $300 million but that is a far cry from the $3.5 billion dollar deficit a year ago. An 85 percent accomplishment of a historical change in our state financial framework is a victory in good governance and a legacy for future Alaskans.

The components of the compromise begin with a reduced budget. When the oil revenues tumbled in 2013 the budget was almost $8 billion. The new budget under this compromise would be close to 5.5 billion, almost a one-third reduction in state spending.

Second, using some of the earnings of the Permanent Fund, and the Reserve and the CBR would produce approximately $2 billion to reduce the deficit and still pay a $1000 dividend to every Alaskan and inflation proof the principal. A fuel tax increase of 8 cents per gallon this year and then 8 cents the following year, making Alaska still one of the lowest fuel taxes in the nation, would produce $80 million a year new revenue intended for highway maintenance. Next a broad based progressive education head tax on both residents and non-residents would produce approximately $100 million in new revenues, which would be intended in this and future years to be spent only on education. The elimination of cashable oil tax credits reduces expenditures by another $1.2 billion over the next 10 years.

The ne?effect would reduce th?FY 1?defici?from more than $2.5 billio?to approximatel?$300 million. It would provide the continuation of vital public services.?It would help maintain our bond rating, whic?i?at serious risk.?And it would maintai?the Constitutional Budget Reserve at a prudent level. In short, i?would solv?85 percen?of our budget crisis and set the stage for the next Legislature to fine tune our fiscal framework and produce a truly balanced budget.

In the spirited debate over the last two legislative sessions on the purposes of a fiscal plan there have been passionate advocates for many principles: ensuring that the sacrifices include all stakeholders from individual residents to oil companies, substantially reducing the level of state spending, establishing a fundamental fairness in who pays for additional revenues, in cutting the budget we do not put the burden on most vulnerable or on the educational investment in the next generations, and that we must protect our savings as they are the sources of a sustainable budget.

The governor has included all of these values in his compromise. The amount and the balance may fall short and not satisfy each advocacy. But please let their idea of perfection of our new fiscal reality be the continuing agenda for future legislative deliberations and actions. It must not be the basis for a continued gridlock, calling it quits, and falling off the fiscal cliff.

No other state in the nation has the opportunity to permanently fund almost 40 percent of its budget with earnings from its savings. By taking this giant step forward toward fiscal stability Alaska can turn the corner, attract investment, rebuild its economic foundation and pass on a legacy of opportunity and prosperity.

It's time to complete the people's business in Juneau, to be responsible and t?pu?the long-term interest o?Alaska first.

Jim Jansen is Chairma?of the Lynden Companies. Marc Langland is the retired Chairma?and CEO of Northrim Bank. Tony Knowles is a former governor of Alaska.

 

Copyright 2017 The Arctic Sounder is a publication of Alaska Media, LLC. This article is © 2017 and limited reproduction rights for personal use are granted for this printing only. This article, in any form, may not be further reproduced without written permission of the publisher and owner, including duplication for not-for-profit purposes. Portions of this article may belong to other agencies; those sections are reproduced here with permission and Alaska Media, LLC makes no provisions for further distribution.